Tag Archives: Alternative Perspectives

Colorized Photos From The Past Will Blow You Away

by Jerome at Powerful Primates

Up until the 1970s, color photography was extremely rare, and so when we think about history prior to that time, we often envision it in black and white. Today’s technology now enables us to “colorize” historical photos, giving us our only chance at seeing what the world really looked like back then. And it was truly spectacular.

Take a trip back in time through these photos below. It’s quite incredible to see Abraham Lincoln and Albert Einstein in living color.

1. Claude Monet in 1923.

2. Brigadier General and actor Jimmy Stewart. Stewart flew 20 combat missions over Nazi-occupied Europe, and even flew one mission during Vietnam.

Jimmy

3. Pablo Picasso.

Picassso

4. Lou Gehrig, July 4, 1939. Photo taken right after his famous retirement speech. He would pass away just two years later from ALS.

Lou Gehrig

5. Times Square 1947.

6. Lee Harvey Oswald, 1963, being transported to questioning before his murder trial for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Lee harvey

7. Helen Keller meeting comedian Charlie Chaplin in 1918.

keller and chaplin

8. Girls delivering ice, 1918.

ice

9. Burger Flipper 1938.

burgers

10. Winston Churchill, 1941.

churchill

11. Albert Einstein, 1921.

einstein

12. Madison Square Park New York City around 1900.

park nyc 1900

13. Marilyn Monroe.

Marilyn

14. Samurai Training 1860.

samurai

15. American Poet Walt Whitman, 1868.

Whitman

16. Hindenburg Blimp crash.

hindenbuerg

17. British Soldiers Returning from the front in 1939.

british soldiers 39

18. Joan Crawford on the set of Letty Lynton, 1932.

joan crawford

19. Country store in July 1939. Gordonton, North Carolina.

NC 1939

20. Mark Twain in 1900.

Mark Twain

21. Albert Einstein on a Long Island beach in 1939.

Einstein on long beach 39

22. Audrey Hepburn.

Hepburn

23. Union Soldiers taking a break 1863.

union 1863

24. Charles Darwin.

Darwin

25. WWII soldiers on Easter.

easter ww2

26. Clint Eastwood, 1962.

clint

27. W.H. Murphy testing the bulletproof vest in 1923.

bulletproof

28. Charlie Chaplin at 27 years old in 1916.

chaplin age 27

29. Elizabeth Taylor in 1956.

elizabeth

30. Big Jay McNeely, Olympic Auditorium, 1953.

mcneely

32. Red Hawk of the Oglala Sioux Tribe on horseback, 1905.

Red Hawk

33. Babe Ruth’s 1920 MLB debut.

babe

34. A Washington, D.C. filling station in 1924.

DC 1924

35. Boys buying flowers in 1908.

flowers 1908

36. An Oklahoman farmer during the great dust bowl in 1939.

the dust bowl

37. Louis Armstrong plays to his wife, Lucille, in Cairo, Egypt 1961.

Louie at the pyramids

38. Brooklyn Bridge in 1904.

brooklyn bridge

39. Two Boxers after a fight.

boxing match

40. 1920s Australian mugshots from the New South Wales Police Dept.

20s mugshot

41. Sophia Loren and Jayne Mansfield.

sophia and jane

42. Brothers Robert Kennedy, Edward “Ted” Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy outside the Oval Office.

kennedys

43. Clint Eastwood working on his 1958 Jag XK 120 in 1960.

clint with his jag

44. Cornell Rowing Team 1907.

cornell rowing

45. View from the Capitol in Nashville, 1864.

nashville

46. Baltimore Slums, 1938.

slums 1938

47. Nazi Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels scowls at a Jewish photographer, 1933.

goebbels

48. Henry Ford, 1919.

henry ford

49. An RAF pilot getting a haircut while reading a book between missions.

RAF haircut

50. Unemployed Lumber Worker and His Wife 1939.

1939 unemployed

51. Alfred Hitchcock.

hitch

52. A car crash in Washington D.C. around 1921.

DC crash 1921

53. President Lincoln with Major General McClernand and Allan Pinkerton at Antietam in 1862.

Lincoln 1862 Antietam

The Great TPP Deathtrap for India, China & 10 Other Member-Nations

The Terms of Destruction

The Clues are all there in Obamatrade and Obamacare

by Jon Rappoport

The truth emerges out of the shadows of secrecy…

Let’s start here. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a trade treaty, coming down the homestretch toward ratification, involving 12 nations which account for a staggering 40% of the world’s GDP. The TPP encompasses 775 million consumers.

Waiting in the wings is something much larger. It is the intention, up the road, to fold India and China into the treaty.

China is the most populous nation in the world. 1.4 billion people. India is the second most populous. 1.28 billion people. India is projected to overtake and pass China by 2025.

During his seven years in office, the most publicly recognizable PR man in the world, Barack Obama, has sweated and hammered on two policies. Just two. He is now in a panic over forcing one of those: the TPP. The other one was Obamacare. That’s it. Everything else was a Sunday picnic in the park.

Obamacare, the US national health insurance plan, when you strip it down to basics, was about one thing: bowing to drug companies.

It brought huge numbers of new people, previously uninsured, into the game. Meaning those people would be able to take the drugs—and the prices for those drugs would remain high.

So it is with the TPP, as it turns out. One of the major priorities is forcing member countries to accept higher pricing on medical drugs. Which was exactly the deal in Obamacare. Big Pharma backed Obamacare for the express purpose of cutting out debates about lowering costs on drugs.

In that respect, Obamacare and the TPP are mirror images of each other.

One other vital detail: the TPP will also allow pharmaceutical companies to push drugs and force them into markets where, ordinarily, they could be rejected as unsafe.

The problem? Well, how about this: every year, in the US, by a conservative assessment, medical drugs kill 106,000 people.

That number comes from Dr. Barbara Starfield, who at the time (July 2000) was a revered public health expert working at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Her assessment, “Is US health really the best in the world?”, was published on July 26, 2000, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

I have often cited her review, and I’ve presented other references that back her up. In fact, if you go to a web page on the FDA’s own site, you will see a similar assessment of medical-drug devastation, including an estimate of non-lethal but debilitating harm:

The FDA website page states there are 2 million serious adverse reactions (ADRs) from the ingestion of medical drugs, annually, in the US. When the FDA says “serious,” they aren’t talking about headaches or slight dizziness or temporary nausea. “Serious” means, among other effects, stroke, heart attack, neurological damage; maiming of that magnitude.

Therefore, per decade, that adds up to 20 million ADRs. 20 million. In the US alone.

And a million deaths per decade in the US, caused by FDA-approved medical drugs.

Getting the picture?

The new normal: dying to get well.
The new normal: dying to get well.

Now here is the payoff, the bottom line: where, in the world, do traditional and older healing methods and remedies survive to the fullest degree?

To put it another way, what are the biggest uncaptured markets and populations that drug companies yearn for and dream about?

China.

India.

This is the future path of the TPP. This is where the Pharma-guided TPP wants to go most fervently. This is the ultimate prize in Pharma’s battle plan. This is the TPP jackpot.

This is ultimately where Pharma wants to replace traditional herbs with…what? Chemical death and destruction.

I put it that way because it’s true, when you eliminate the propaganda and look at the track record.

1.4 billion people in China. 1.28 billion people in India.

Would you care to extrapolate the death numbers? And the “serious adverse-effect” numbers. Per year? Per decade? For China and India combined? Do the math.

If in the US, with a population of 325 million, medical drugs kill 100,000 people per year, the number of deaths for the combined populations of India and China (2.68 billion people) comes out to 824,000 per year. 8.24 million deaths per decade.

Serious adverse drug reactions in a population of 2.68 billion? More than 16.4 million per year. More than 164 million per decade.

If you told some cold-eyed lunatic military planner you could achieve those results, with chemical warfare, on a sustained basis, year in and year out, with absolutely no detection, with no blowback, no criminal war trials, with enormous accrued profits, with claims of “curing disease,” he would jump out of his chair and order champagne and call you a genius.

That’s where we are. That’s what the TPP, up the road, is all about.

China and India are the ultimate targets. Make no mistake about it.

And waiting in the wings: Indonesia, with the fourth largest population in the world: 252 million people.

Let me know when you see the statistics cited in this article unequivocally presented in any major mainstream news outlet in the world, along with their relation to the TPP.

In the meantime, I’ll take a brief coffee break…and be back in a hundred years.

Jon Rappoport

Fast Track

You Are Free, Like it or Not

by David Cain of Raptitutde

One evening I went with my family to a Thai restaurant for dinner. They seated us near the back, not far from the kitchen doors.

A very bubbly waitress brought us our menus, filled our waters and told us to let her know if we needed anything, or had any questions about anything at all.

When she came back, we ordered. “Perfect!” she said with a huge smile, taking our menus. She went off to the kitchen. As soon as she was through the doors, her voice changed. She was chatting with the staff and we could hear every word.

“Oh my God, I was so sick this morning! I couldn’t stop puking. My boyfriend had to hold my hair back for me.” She went on about the trip to bar, the shooters, the cab ride, the stupid friends who didn’t show up. Lots of details and swear words.

Then she came through the doors again, her waitress face back on, and took orders from a few more tables. She went back into the kitchen again. More profane banter. When she brought out our food, she had a wide, wholesome smile, and it was really hard not to laugh.

I didn’t know it at the time, but Jean-Paul Sartre had written about a similar scenario to illustrate a human tendency he called bad faith. His waiter at a cafe seemed to be completely under the spell of his role as a server. He moved too quickly, too snappily. He spoke about the daily specials with an enthusiasm that no food could warrant in real life. His gestures were so ridiculously waiterly that he seemed to have lost track of the fact that he was a free-choosing person, as if there was nothing to him besides his current role.

Sartre believed that we have much more freedom than we tend to acknowledge. We habitually deny it to protect ourselves from the horror of accepting full responsibility for our lives. In every instant, we are free to behave however we like, but we often act as though circumstances have reduced our options down to one or two ways to move forward. 

This is bad faith: when we convince ourselves that we’re less free than we really are, so that we don’t have to feel responsible for what we ultimately make of ourselves. It really seems like you must get up at 7:00 every Monday, because constraints such as your job, your family’s schedule, and your body’s needs leave no other possibility. But it’s not true — you can set your alarm for any time, and are free to explore what’s different about life when you do. You don’t have to do things the way you’ve always done them, and that is true in every moment you’re alive. Yet we feel like we’re on a pretty rigid track most of the time.

We often think of freedom as something that can only make life easier, but it can actually be overwhelming and even terrifying. Think about it: we can take, at any moment, any one of infinite roads into the future, and nothing less than the rest of our lives hinges on each choice. So it can be a huge relief to tell ourselves that we actually have fewer options available to us, or even no choice at all.

In other words, even though we want the best life possible, if life is going to be disappointing, we’d at least like that to be someone else’s fault.

When freedom is scary, we pretend it isn’t there

As soon as I learned about the concept of bad faith, I started noticing that I am guilty of it all the time. I might delay on a worthwhile-but-nerve-wracking phone call until it’s no longer an option to make, and tell myself the opportunity slipped through my fingers accidentally. I might pretend I didn’t hear a critical comment so that I didn’t have to decide how to respond to it. I often tell myself I can’t do any worthwhile work unless I have two uninterrupted hours to do it in.

I have a long history of bad faith. Maybe you do too. In high school, I remember deliberately learning as little as possible about scholarship opportunities, because I’d rather not apply for one than apply and see it go to someone else. Afterwards I might even complain that a guy like me could never compete with all the goodie-goodie students who schmoozed with the teachers.

I also used bad faith to rationalize my extreme levels of shyness, making life much harder in the process. Some part of me knew that being a functioning adult meant learning how to engage in small talk. But it was scary, so I told myself that small talk is all vapid and worthless, and I was abstaining from it out of principle, rather than fear. Like a lot of very shy people, I didn’t date in high school because I was afraid of rejection, but told myself it was because I had high standards.

We’ve probably all done this one: you’re dreading a to-do item because it requires a difficult decision. So you put it off, ignoring reminders you’ve set for yourself, putting less-important things ahead of it. You do this even though some part of you knows it has to be done anyway, and delays only make things worse for you. You make excuses why you can’t do it today — “I should get a better sleep before dealing with this” — even though nobody is fooled but yourself, and not even you benefits from your pretending you can’t do it yet. But you do get that hit of relief when you make a new excuse.

Sartre

All of these kinds of behaviors are ways of denying our own freedom. If we acknowledged all of our options, the obvious thing to do might be something intimidating. Once you’ve acknowledged that it isn’t actually impossible for you to quit smoking, then you have to quit smoking. When freedom is scary, we pretend it isn’t there.

Bad faith is easier to notice in others than ourselves. You’ve almost certainly known people who complain about their situations, and insist that it is beyond their control when it obviously isn’t. When it’s really obvious, we call it a victim mentality. We tell ourselves stories that make us out to be hapless objects in the world — billiard balls on the table, rather than the players.

A former friend of mine perpetually expressed dissatisfaction with his overweight body, and had a shoot-down reason for every possible way to lose the weight. Running is bad for the knees. Restricting your diet leads to eating disorders. Lifting weights is for meatheads. Gyms are trying to rip you off. It was obvious these were not real barriers he ran into when he tried, but ways of arguing that his circumstances alone are responsible for his troubles, and that he was out of moves.

Essentially, all instances of bad faith are performances of some kind, in which we’re acting as though our hands are tied. We’re trying to convince ourselves (often by way of convincing others) that we actually can’t do the right thing, when in fact we simply won’t.

where

Life is a field, not a corridor

Bad faith leads to living inauthentically — living others’ values because you’re afraid of living your own. It is inherently self-defeating.

Sartre wanted us to really feel our freedom, as an almost physical sensation — the sensation of walking down a corridor, then noticing you were in a field the whole time. It is an exhilarating feeling to consciously go the other way at a juncture where you normally act in bad faith. It feels like you’ve unlocked a hidden area with new skills and possibilities, and that such secret rooms are everywhere.

Whenever you feel a sense of “this is just the way it is”, there is probably some bad faith there. For years I assumed I can’t expect to get any writing done after 5pm — the energy or focus just isn’t there, so I’m practically sentenced to spend the evening reading, watching something on a screen, going out or otherwise not working.

This is an old, self-defeating lie, and there’s no telling what it’s cost me. There’s no barrier at 5pm. The line is completely imaginary. There’s just a strong aversion to my work when I get close to that time of day, and I pretend it’s some kind of natural law.

Our lives are riddled with imaginary lines. Bedtime isn’t a real thing. It’s a choice, every time. Going to work is a choice. Eating lunch is a choice. Letting ourselves down is a choice. Meeting a deadline is a choice, and missing it is a choice, as much as we’d like to believe each of those outcomes was inevitable all along.

Noticing bad faith doesn’t cure it, but it makes it harder to ignore. We can let ourselves suffer certain problems for years, if we think they’re happening to us, the way weather does. But once you recognize a particular condition in your life as ultimately voluntary, its days are probably numbered.

I can’t describe to you how strong a feeling it is, but once it’s past 5pm, it truly feels like I can’t write. It seems like the part of my brain that does that is shuttered like a storefront on a Sunday evening.

But when I actually do sit down at six or seven or eight and start typing, the words come out like any other time. The door was always open, I just walked by it again and again and again.

Free to fly